An Analysis Of Fifth-Grade Students’ Difficulties In Solving Fraction Problems Based On Newman’s Error Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56404/jels.v5i2.434Keywords:
Difficulty Analysis, Fraction Word Problems, Newman Procedure, Elementary SchoolAbstract
This study aims to analyze the difficulties experienced by fifth-grade students at each stage of the Newman Procedure in solving fraction word problems and to identify the factors contributing to these difficulties. This study employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive research design. The research subjects consisted of 22 fifth-grade students who completed a written test. Five students were purposively selected as interview participants based on the variation in the difficulties they experienced, while one fifth-grade teacher served as a supporting informant. Data were collected through written tests, semi-structured interviews, and documentation. The data were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. Data validity was established through technical and source triangulation. The findings showed that students did not experience difficulties at the reading stage, but difficulties were identified at the comprehension, transformation, process skills, and encoding stages. The factors contributing to these difficulties included limited understanding of problem information, confusion in connecting problem information with appropriate mathematical operations, inadequate mastery of fraction calculation procedures, and hesitation in writing the final answer. These factors are interrelated and collectively affect the overall problem-solving process. The findings are expected to provide teachers with information for designing more effective mathematics instruction based on the stages of the Newman Procedure, particularly in helping elementary school students overcome difficulties in solving fraction word problems.
References
Anggraeni, D. A., & Ngazizah, N. (2025). Analysis of students' difficulties in solving mathematical story problems based on Newman's theory on fraction material for Grade III at Bulus State Elementary School. Pendas: Scientific Journal of Elementary Education, 10(03), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i03.32620
Ekadayanti, W., Ili, L., Kadir, Yanti, N. R., & Hesti. (2024). Design of a mathematics teaching module for elementary school based on ethnomathematics of Buton traditional houses to improve numerical literacy skills. Jurnal Amal Pendidikan, 5(3).
Ekadayanti, W., Parisu, C. Z. L., Yanti, N. R., Sisi, L., & Saputra, E. E. (2024). Pembuatan media pembelajaran matematika dan sains berbasis Canva untuk meningkatkan kecakapan literasi digital guru SD. Journal of Human and Education (JAHE), 4(4), 1007–1015. https://doi.org/10.31004/jh.v4i4.1415
Ekadayanti, W., Saputra, E. E., Fista, B., & Yanti, N. R. (2024). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika SD kelas V berdasar Newman Error Analysis. Student Journal of Early Childhood Education, 4(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.37411/sjece.v4i1.3041
Ekadayanti, W., Saputra, E. E., Fista, B., & Yanti, N. R. (2024). Analysis of students' errors in solving fifth grade elementary school mathematics story problems based on Newman Error Analysis. Student Journal of Early Childhood Education, 4(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.37411/sjece.v4i1.3041
Firdaus, H. H., Febriani, W. D., & Sidik, G. S. (2025). Analysis of students' learning difficulties in solving story problems on fraction addition material in class V of SDN 3 Sukasari. Didactics: Scientific Journal of PGSD STKIP Subang, 11(02), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v11i02.6632
Hadaming, H., & Wahyudi, A. A. (2022). Analysis of student errors based on Newman's theory in solving elementary school mathematics story problems. JUDIKDAS: Indonesian Journal of Elementary Education, 1(4), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.51574/judikdas.v1i4.484
Huljannah, M., Nadjamuddin, A., Kalaka, F. R. S., & Risnawaty S. Nteya. (2022). Analysis of Grade III students' difficulties in solving fraction story problems as a form of teaching management. Irfani (eJournal), 18(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.30603/ir.v18i2.3473
Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. (2025). Indonesian Education Report Card 2024. Jakarta: Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Rahmawati, N. D., Rubowo, M. R., & Rahmayani, I. D. (2022). Analysis of students' errors in solving story problems on fraction material reviewed from mathematical problem-solving ability. JIPMat, 7(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v7i1.11734
Ramadayanti, A., & Supiat, S. (2024). Written mathematical communication skills in solving HOTS problems. Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 12(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v12i2.72721
Ridhaningtyas, L. P., Idammatussilmi, I., & Prasetya, A. T. (2025). Students' difficulties in solving word problems on fraction material based on Newman's theory. AKSIOMA: Journal of Mathematics Education Study Program, 14(3), 748. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v14i3.6541
Riswandi, Muh. I., & Rukli, R. (2023). Analysis of elementary school students' mathematical comprehension ability using TIMSS questions on fractions. Didactical Mathematics, 5(2), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v5i2.6126
Sari, P. D. R., & Subekti, E. E. (2023). Analysis of students' difficulties in solving mathematical problem-solving problems on fraction arithmetic operations in Grade V of Kauman Blora State Elementary School. Journal of Educational Insights, 3(1), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.26877/wp.v3i1.11357
Sugiyono. (2022). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods. Alfabeta.
Ulfa, N., Jupri, A., & Turmudi, T. (2021). Analysis of learning barriers in fraction material. Research and Development Journal of Education, 7(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v7i2.8509















