ADDITIONAL MENU
Author Guidelines
1. General Information
Gerasi in Mathematics Education (GIME) is a peer-reviewed, open-access academic journal that publishes original and high-quality research in mathematics education. The journal accepts manuscripts that provide significant theoretical, empirical, methodological, or practical contributions to the field of mathematics education.
GIME welcomes submissions from researchers, lecturers, teachers, educators, students, and practitioners from Indonesia and other countries.
Manuscripts may be submitted in English or Indonesian. However, authors are strongly encouraged to submit manuscripts in English to increase international visibility and accessibility.
All manuscripts must be submitted through the journal's online submission system. Manuscripts submitted by email or other channels will not normally be considered.
2. Manuscript Types
GIME accepts the following types of manuscripts:
A. Original Research Article
Original research articles should present new empirical findings based on rigorous quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods research.
B. Systematic Literature Review
Systematic reviews should use a clearly defined review methodology, comprehensive search strategy, explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria, systematic analysis, and transparent reporting of the review process.
C. Scoping Review
Scoping reviews should systematically map existing literature, identify research trends, gaps, concepts, and emerging areas within mathematics education.
D. Conceptual or Theoretical Article
Conceptual articles should provide substantial theoretical arguments, critical synthesis, conceptual frameworks, or new perspectives relevant to mathematics education.
E. Methodological Study
Methodological studies may address the development, validation, adaptation, or application of research methods, instruments, assessment tools, or analytical approaches in mathematics education.
F. Educational Innovation and Practice
Articles in this category should present innovative mathematics education practices, learning designs, instructional models, learning media, or educational interventions supported by appropriate evidence.
3. Originality and Exclusivity
Submitted manuscripts must be original and must not have been previously published in any journal, book, conference proceeding, or other publication in substantially similar form.
A manuscript submitted to GIME must not be simultaneously under consideration by another journal.
By submitting a manuscript, authors confirm that:
- the manuscript is original;
- the manuscript has not been previously published;
- the manuscript is not currently under consideration by another publication;
- all authors have approved the submitted version;
- all sources have been properly acknowledged;
- the research has been conducted ethically; and
- the manuscript does not contain fabricated, falsified, or manipulated data.
4. Language
GIME accepts manuscripts in:
- English
- Indonesian
Authors are responsible for ensuring that the manuscript is written in clear, coherent, and academically appropriate language.
For manuscripts written in English, authors should ensure appropriate grammar, terminology, spelling, punctuation, and academic style.
Poor language quality may result in a request for revision before the manuscript proceeds to peer review.
5. Manuscript Preparation
Authors must prepare manuscripts using the official GIME manuscript template.
The manuscript should be prepared in accordance with the journal's formatting requirements concerning:
- page layout;
- font type and size;
- line spacing;
- paragraph formatting;
- headings and subheadings;
- tables and figures;
- mathematical equations;
- citations and references; and
- supplementary materials.
Authors are strongly encouraged to use the journal template from the beginning of manuscript preparation.
6. Recommended Manuscript Structure
For original research articles, the recommended structure is:
- Title
- Author Information
- Abstract
- Keywords
- Introduction
- Literature Review / Theoretical Framework (optional)
- Research Method
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Implications
- Limitations
- Acknowledgments
- Funding Statement
- Conflict of Interest Statement
- Data Availability Statement
- References
The structure may be adjusted according to the research design and type of manuscript.
7. Title
The title should accurately represent the content of the manuscript and clearly communicate the main research topic.
The title should:
- be concise and informative;
- clearly identify the main research focus;
- avoid unnecessary abbreviations;
- avoid excessive general statements;
- use appropriate academic terminology; and
- accurately reflect the research conducted.
Authors should avoid overly long titles and titles that contain unnecessary claims or conclusions.
8. Author Information
All authors must provide complete and accurate information during submission.
The author information should include:
- Full name;
- Institutional affiliation;
- Department or study program;
- Faculty or school where applicable;
- Institution;
- City and country;
- ORCID iD, where available; and
- Email address of the corresponding author.
The corresponding author is responsible for communication with the editorial office and for ensuring that all authors approve the submitted manuscript.
9. Authorship
Authorship should reflect substantial contributions to the research and manuscript.
All listed authors should have:
- made substantial contributions to the conception, design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of the research;
- contributed to drafting or critically revising the manuscript;
- approved the final version;
- agreed to be accountable for the integrity of the work.
Individuals who do not meet authorship criteria should not be listed as authors but may be acknowledged where appropriate.
Changes to authorship after submission require written approval from all authors and are subject to editorial consideration.
10. Abstract
The abstract should provide a concise and informative summary of the manuscript.
For original research articles, the abstract should generally include:
- Background or research context
- Objective
- Method
- Results
- Conclusion
- Implications, where appropriate
The abstract should be understandable without referring to the main manuscript.
Authors should avoid:
- citations;
- unexplained abbreviations;
- excessive methodological details; and
- claims that are not supported by the study.
11. Keywords
Authors should provide 3–6 keywords that accurately represent the main concepts of the manuscript.
Keywords should be specific, relevant, and useful for indexing and discoverability.
Authors should avoid using words that are already excessively generic unless they are essential to the topic.
12. Introduction
The Introduction should clearly establish the context and significance of the research.
It should generally address:
- the background of the research problem;
- the current state of knowledge;
- relevant previous studies;
- the research gap;
- the significance or novelty of the study;
- the research objective; and
- research questions or hypotheses, where appropriate.
The Introduction should demonstrate why the study is necessary and how it contributes to existing mathematics education research.
13. Literature Review and Theoretical Framework
The literature review should critically engage with relevant and credible scholarly sources.
Authors should:
- use recent and relevant literature;
- identify important theoretical perspectives;
- synthesize rather than merely summarize previous studies;
- identify gaps or unresolved issues;
- establish the conceptual basis of the research; and
- explain how the present study contributes to the existing literature.
Authors are encouraged to cite relevant peer-reviewed international and national literature.
14. Research Method
The Method section must provide sufficient information to allow readers to understand and evaluate the research process.
Depending on the research design, authors should report:
- research design;
- research setting and context;
- participants or research subjects;
- population and sampling procedures;
- instruments and measurement procedures;
- validity and reliability procedures;
- data collection procedures;
- intervention or treatment procedures, where applicable;
- data analysis techniques;
- ethical considerations; and
- relevant software or analytical tools.
For qualitative studies, authors should clearly explain the research approach, participant selection, data collection, coding procedures, analytical process, and strategies used to establish trustworthiness.
For quantitative studies, authors should clearly explain the statistical methods and assumptions used.
For mixed-methods studies, authors should explain the rationale and procedures for integrating quantitative and qualitative evidence.
15. Results
The Results section should present the findings clearly and systematically.
Results should directly address the research questions or objectives.
Authors should:
- present relevant findings objectively;
- avoid unnecessary repetition;
- use tables and figures appropriately;
- provide sufficient statistical or qualitative evidence;
- report relevant effect sizes or other appropriate indicators where applicable; and
- distinguish clearly between results and interpretation.
Tables and figures should not simply duplicate information already presented in the text.
16. Discussion
The Discussion should interpret the findings in relation to the research questions, theoretical framework, and previous literature.
Authors should:
- explain the meaning and significance of the findings;
- compare findings with previous research;
- identify similarities and differences;
- discuss possible explanations;
- highlight theoretical contributions;
- explain implications for mathematics education practice;
- discuss unexpected or contradictory findings where relevant; and
- identify areas for future research.
The Discussion should go beyond repeating the Results section.
17. Conclusion
The Conclusion should provide a concise synthesis of the main findings and their significance.
The conclusion should:
- directly address the research objectives;
- summarize the principal findings;
- explain the contribution of the study;
- avoid introducing new data or arguments; and
- provide relevant recommendations where appropriate.
18. Implications
Authors are encouraged to explain the implications of their findings for:
- mathematics teaching;
- mathematics learning;
- teacher education;
- curriculum development;
- educational assessment;
- educational policy;
- educational technology; or
- future research.
Implications should be supported by the findings and should not extend beyond the evidence provided by the study.
19. Limitations
Authors should transparently report important limitations of the study.
Limitations may include issues related to:
- sample size;
- research context;
- research design;
- measurement instruments;
- data collection;
- generalizability or transferability;
- analytical procedures; or
- other methodological constraints.
Acknowledging limitations strengthens the transparency and credibility of the research.
20. Tables and Figures
Tables and figures should be numbered consecutively according to their order of appearance in the manuscript.
Each table and figure should have:
- a clear title or caption;
- appropriate labels;
- sufficient explanation;
- readable formatting; and
- a source note where applicable.
Tables and figures must be referred to explicitly in the manuscript.
Authors must ensure that all figures and images are of sufficient quality for publication.
Any material reproduced from another source must have appropriate permission and attribution where required.
21. Mathematical Equations
Mathematical equations should be prepared using appropriate equation-editing software and should remain editable where possible.
Equations should be numbered consecutively when they are referenced in the text.
Variables, symbols, and mathematical notation should be defined clearly and used consistently throughout the manuscript.
22. References and Citations
Authors must ensure that every source cited in the manuscript appears in the reference list and that every reference listed is cited in the manuscript.
Authors should prioritize:
- peer-reviewed journal articles;
- recent scholarly publications;
- reputable academic books;
- authoritative reports; and
- relevant primary sources.
Authors are encouraged to use current literature, particularly recent research relevant to the manuscript's topic.
The journal recommends the use of a reference management tool such as Zotero, Mendeley, or EndNote to ensure consistency.
Authors must follow the citation and reference style specified in the official GIME manuscript template.
References should include DOI information where available.
Authors should avoid excessive self-citation and citation practices intended primarily to manipulate citation metrics.
23. Research Ethics
Research involving human participants must comply with applicable ethical standards and institutional requirements.
Where applicable, manuscripts should include:
- name of the ethics committee or institution;
- ethical approval number;
- date of approval; and
- informed consent procedures.
If formal ethical approval was not required, authors should provide an appropriate explanation.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that research participants' rights, privacy, confidentiality, and welfare are adequately protected.
24. Data Availability Statement
Authors should provide a data availability statement where applicable.
Examples include:
Data available upon request:
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Publicly available data:
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in [repository name] at [persistent identifier].
No data applicable:
Data sharing is not applicable to this article because no datasets were generated or analyzed.
25. Funding Statement
Authors must disclose financial support received for conducting the research or preparing the manuscript.
The funding statement should identify the funding organization and grant information where applicable.
If the research received no external funding, authors may state:
This research received no external funding.
26. Conflict of Interest
Authors must disclose any financial, professional, personal, or institutional relationships that could potentially influence the research or publication process.
If there is no conflict of interest, authors may state:
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
27. Acknowledgments
Individuals or organizations that contributed to the research but do not meet the criteria for authorship may be acknowledged.
Acknowledgments may include:
- research assistance;
- technical assistance;
- administrative support;
- institutional support; or
- other non-author contributions.
Authors should obtain permission from individuals before including their names in the Acknowledgments section.
28. Plagiarism and Similarity Screening
All submitted manuscripts are subject to plagiarism and similarity screening.
The editorial team evaluates similarity reports to identify:
- plagiarism;
- duplicate publication;
- inappropriate text reuse;
- unattributed quotation; and
- other forms of academic misconduct.
The similarity percentage is not considered the sole basis for determining plagiarism. Each case is evaluated in context.
Manuscripts containing substantial evidence of plagiarism or academic misconduct may be rejected.
29. Use of Artificial Intelligence
Authors may use artificial intelligence tools for limited purposes such as language improvement, grammar checking, translation assistance, or technical support, provided that their use does not compromise the originality, accuracy, integrity, or transparency of the manuscript.
AI tools must not be listed as authors.
Authors remain fully responsible for:
- the accuracy of all content;
- originality of the manuscript;
- verification of references;
- interpretation of research findings;
- protection of confidential information; and
- compliance with ethical and publication standards.
Where AI tools have been used substantially in the preparation of the manuscript, authors should disclose the use transparently in an appropriate section of the manuscript.
AI-generated content must not be presented as independently verified scholarly evidence.
30. Submission Checklist
Before submitting a manuscript, authors should ensure that:
- The manuscript fits the Focus and Scope of GIME.
- The manuscript is original and has not been published elsewhere.
- The manuscript is not under consideration by another journal.
- The manuscript follows the official GIME template.
- The title accurately represents the study.
- The abstract is complete and informative.
- Appropriate keywords are provided.
- All authors and affiliations are correctly identified.
- ORCID iDs are provided where available.
- The research methodology is clearly described.
- Ethical approval is reported where applicable.
- Tables and figures are properly numbered and cited.
- All in-text citations appear in the reference list.
- All references are cited in the manuscript.
- DOI information is included where available.
- Funding information is provided where applicable.
- Conflict of interest information is provided.
- Data availability information is provided where applicable.
- The manuscript has been checked for plagiarism and inappropriate text reuse.
- The manuscript has been carefully proofread before submission.
31. Submission Procedure
Authors should submit manuscripts through the GIME online submission system.
During submission, authors may be required to provide:
- Manuscript file;
- Author information;
- Affiliation information;
- ORCID information, where available;
- Abstract and keywords;
- Cover letter or submission statement, where required;
- Ethical approval information, where applicable;
- Funding information;
- Conflict of interest statement;
- Data availability statement; and
- Other supplementary materials where applicable.
Authors should carefully complete all required metadata fields in the OJS submission system.
Incomplete or inaccurate metadata may delay the editorial process.
32. Peer Review
All manuscripts that pass the initial editorial screening are evaluated through a double-blind peer-review process.
At least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise may be assigned to each manuscript.
Reviewers assess the manuscript based on originality, relevance, theoretical foundation, methodological rigor, quality of analysis, interpretation of findings, contribution to mathematics education, and overall academic quality.
The final decision is made by the editor based on reviewers' recommendations and the journal's editorial policies.
33. Revision
Authors receiving a revision decision must submit:
- A revised manuscript; and
- A detailed response to reviewers' comments.
Authors should clearly indicate how each reviewer comment has been addressed.
Where an author disagrees with a reviewer's recommendation, the response should provide a clear academic justification supported by evidence or appropriate references.
Failure to provide an adequate response may delay the editorial decision.
34. Publication Decision
The possible editorial decisions are:
- Accept
- Accept with Minor Revisions
- Major Revision
- Resubmit for Further Review
- Reject
The final decision is made by the editorial team based on the manuscript's academic quality, relevance, originality, methodological rigor, reviewer recommendations, and compliance with journal policies.
Acceptance of a manuscript is not based on the author's nationality, institutional affiliation, academic position, or personal characteristics.
35. Publication Ethics and Academic Integrity
Authors are expected to comply with the journal's Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement.
GIME does not tolerate:
- plagiarism;
- fabrication;
- falsification;
- duplicate publication;
- redundant publication;
- inappropriate authorship;
- citation manipulation;
- peer-review manipulation;
- unethical research practices; or
- other forms of academic misconduct.
Suspected violations may be investigated by the editorial team and may result in rejection, withdrawal, correction, expression of concern, or retraction.
36. Copyright and Licensing
Authors retain copyright of their work while granting Gerasi in Mathematics Education (GIME) the right of first publication.
Published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated on the article page.
Authors may share and disseminate their published work in accordance with the applicable license.
37. Open Access
GIME provides immediate open access to all published articles.
All published content is freely available to readers without subscription or access fees, subject to the applicable copyright and licensing conditions.
The journal supports the principle that unrestricted access to scholarly research contributes to the advancement and dissemination of knowledge.
38. Author Fees
If applicable, all publication-related fees must be clearly stated on the journal's Author Fees / Article Processing Charge page.
Where the journal does not charge authors, the journal states:
Submission Fee: 0 IDR
Article Processing Charge: 0 IDR
Publication Fee: 0 IDR
No author's ability to pay publication-related fees shall influence the editorial decision.
39. Post-Publication Corrections and Retractions
Authors are responsible for notifying the editorial office if significant errors are discovered after publication.
Depending on the nature and seriousness of the issue, the journal may publish:
- a correction;
- an erratum;
- an expression of concern; or
- a retraction.
The journal maintains the integrity and transparency of the scholarly record by documenting significant post-publication changes appropriately.
40. Final Statement
Authors are responsible for ensuring that submitted manuscripts comply with all applicable journal policies and ethical standards.
Submission of a manuscript to Gerasi in Mathematics Education (GIME) indicates that the authors have read and agreed to the journal's Author Guidelines, Publication Ethics, Peer Review Process, Copyright and Licensing Policy, and other applicable editorial policies.
The editorial team reserves the right to return manuscripts that do not comply with the journal's requirements or to reject manuscripts that do not meet the journal's academic and ethical standards.




