Research Approaches and Methods in Educational Management Studies: A Literature Review and Future Research Directions

Authors

  • Putri Enita Hariani Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
  • Moch. Rikza Alkhubra Abdul Jabbar Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56404/priem.v1i1.454

Keywords:

Research Approaches, Research Methods, Educational Management

Abstract

This study aims to examine how educational management research is conducted by mapping research approaches, research designs, data collection methods, and data analysis techniques, while also identifying methodological trends and future research directions. The study employs a literature review approach by examining scholarly publications relevant to educational management, educational administration, and educational leadership. Relevant literature was identified through searches of academic databases using keywords related to educational management and research methodology. The selected literature was thematically analyzed by identifying and categorizing methodological characteristics, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches, research designs, data collection techniques, and data analysis strategies. The findings indicate that educational management research employs diverse methodological approaches in response to the characteristics of research questions and the organizational contexts under investigation. Quantitative approaches are widely used to examine relationships among organizational variables, whereas qualitative approaches provide deeper insights into organizational processes, experiences, and contextual dynamics. Mixed methods approaches offer opportunities to integrate empirical patterns with contextual explanations. The review further highlights the need for stronger methodological integration through longitudinal designs, multilevel analyses, cross-context comparative studies, and the use of more diverse data sources. This study provides a methodological synthesis that can serve as a reference for researchers in selecting appropriate research approaches and developing future research agendas in educational management.

References

Adeyemi, B. B. (2024). Reliability and validity in quantitative research. In Applied linguistics and language education research methods: Fundamentals and innovations (pp. 86-102). . IGI Global Scientific Publishing.

Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2021). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and moral reasoning. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 20(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1585551

Bush, T. (2007). Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy and practice. South African Journal of Education, 27(3), 391-406.

Chong, S. W., Lin, T. J., & Chen, Y. (2022). A methodological review of systematic literature reviews in higher education: Heterogeneity and homogeneity. Educational Research Review, 35, 100426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100426

Cong-Lem, N. (2025). Scale validation in applied linguistics: Methodological trends and challenges. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 100217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100217

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. In Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (pp. 53–106). Sage Publications, Inc.

Fakhreddin, F. (2023). Nonresponse bias and common method bias in survey research (pp. 275-282). New York: Routledge.

Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools. Wallace Foundation, 2(1), 30-41.

Karimi, H., & Khawaja, S. (2023). A systematic review of methodological approaches in educational leadership research from 2016 to 2019. Creative Education, 14(9), 1847-1862. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.149118

Klingberg, S., Stalmeijer, R. E., & Varpio, L. (2024). Using framework analysis methods for qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 164. Medical Teacher, 46(5), 603-610. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2259073

Kuckartz, U., & Radiker, S. (2023). Qualitative content analysis: Methods, practice and software. Sage publications.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, ., 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

Matias, C. E. (Ed. ). (2021). The handbook of critical theoretical research methods in education. New York: Routledge.

Matos, J. F., Piedade, J., Freitas, A., Pedro, N., Dorotea, N., Pedro, A., & Galego, C. (2023). Teaching and learning research methodologies in education: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020173

Mertkan, S., & Gümüş, S. (2026). Review of systematic reviews in educational leadership and management: Methods used, topics explored and geographies covered. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 54(3), 693-721. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241291197

Mifsud, D. (2024). A systematic review of school distributed leadership: Exploring research purposes, concepts and approaches in the field between 2010 and 2022. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 56(2), 154-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2022.2158181

Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of education 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122664

Ngulube, P. (2023). Improving the quality of reporting findings using computer data analysis applications in educational research in context. Heliyon, 9(9). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(23)06891-3

Özdemir, N., Gümüş, S., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2024). A systematic review of research on the relationship between school leadership and student achievement: An updated framework and future direction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(5), 1020-1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221118662

Snyder, H. (2024). Designing the literature review for a strong contribution. Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 551-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197704

Thunberg, S., & Arnell, L. (2022). Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research–A research review of the use of digital interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(6), 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1935565

Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2020). Learning management systems, an overview. Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies, 1052-1058. https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_248

Whittaker, T. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (n.d.). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. In 2022. Routledge.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Zhou, Y., Zhou, Y., & Machtmes, K. (2024). Mixed methods integration strategies used in education: A systematic review. Methodological Innovations, 17(1), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991231217937

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Enita Hariani, P. ., & Alkhubra Abdul Jabbar, M. R. . (2026). Research Approaches and Methods in Educational Management Studies: A Literature Review and Future Research Directions. Journal of Policy Review and Innovation in Educational Management, 1(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.56404/priem.v1i1.454